[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation of list.
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: Moderation of list.
- From: Harmon Seaver <hseaver@ZEBRA.NET>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 08:11:00 -0500
- Message-Id: <199704201311.GAA21098@SUL-Server-2.Stanford.EDU>
- Organization: Maddog Press
- Sender: "The Book Arts: binding, typography, collecting" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
I vote for moderation -- the volume of this list has grown
tremendously and much of it is strictly personal or of the "me too"
variety. In other words, a very large signal to noise ratio. If Peter
wants to take on the workload of moderation, then I'm all for it. I've
been (and am) on a number of moderated lists and only one of them has
any tendency toward censorsorship -- and that one is the gov-docs lists,
and truthfully, it is pretty bad. But what else can you expect from
government documents types anyway, eh?
Harmon Seaver email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
"Facts an' facts, an' t'ings an' t'ings: dem's all a lotta fockin'
bullshit. Hear me! Dere is no truth but de one truth, an' that is
de truth of Jah Rastafari." -- Sir Robert Marley, 1978
Copyright, Harmon F. Seaver, 1997. License to distribute this post is
available to Microsoft for US$1,000 per instance, or local equivalent.