[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: philosophy of bookbinding
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: philosophy of bookbinding
- From: "starr jr raymond h." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 13:26:43 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <199810051711.NAA24378@umbc5.umbc.edu>
- Message-Id: <199810051729.KAA13248@SUL-Server-2.stanford.edu>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.dreamscape.com/pdverhey" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
I agree with Janet. Further, cross-pollination is typically a good idea.
We need to accept this with regard to books but also in relation to the
debate about defining "art" and "craft".
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Janet L. Maher wrote:
> These days in the art world all categories are cross-pollinating and
> there's no end in sight.
R. H. Starr, Jr., Ph.D. I am not related to Kenneth Starr
Professor (but, his wife's a distant cousin)
Department of Psychology
1000 Hilltop Circle
Baltimore, MD 21250