[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Digital Dark Age"
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: "Digital Dark Age"
- From: G <gmcneese@SURFSOUTH.COM>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 08:45:11 -0500
- Message-Id: <199902131341.FAA20776@palimpsest.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.dreamscape.com/pdverhey" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
So, what's the conclusion here? Are we gonna bind our cd's with rabbit fur or not?
DT Fletcher wrote:
> In a message dated 2/12/99 1:37:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, dmac@BWAY.NET
> << This is a serious problem. To ignore it, or to try to say it doesn't
> exist, is shortsighted and historically unsound. There won't always
> be punched cards. There won' always be 9 track tapes. And there
> won't always be 386-architecture PCs that can read today's particular
> kind of removable CD-ROM media.
> David Macfarlane. >>
> Sorry Dave, you are making basically the same logical error as the others. You
> reiterate a list of technologies that have become obsolete and then leap to
> the conclusion that therefore all technologies must become obsolete with
> absolutely no basis for it. Some technologies have remained with us since
> their invention and no doubt will continue to be used as long as modern
> civilization exists.
> Computers will continue to exist in one form or another for a very long time.
> In fact, I think we can agree that computers in the future will be very much
> more powerful than today. Yet, for some reason you seem to believe that the
> computers of tommorow will be so dim, stupid and inflexible that they won't be
> able to run Windows if they wanted to.
> The issue of technological obsolence was one, actually THE, reason for the
> adoption of the IBM clone and Intel 386 technology. Was it the best? No. But,
> everyone (sorry MAC people) decided that this was the one and away it goes.
> Computer technologly will continue to evolve and grow, but no general business
> computer of the future can possibly suceed without being IBM PC clone
> compatable. The very interesting part of this, other than unfortunately
> making Billy Gates the richest person in the world, is that it guarentees us a
> clear communication channel to the future.
> With a compatable future computer system assured the only question will be if
> the people of the future will be interested in what we put on our CD-ROMs.
> That they will be able to read and view what we put on them is without
> dt fletcher