[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Digital Dark Age"
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: "Digital Dark Age"
- From: Paul Baechler <pbaechle@BELLSOUTH.NET>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 20:56:10 -0600
- Message-Id: <199902140324.TAA16136@palimpsest.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.dreamscape.com/pdverhey" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
On 2/13/99 19:29 DT Fletcher said:
>In a message dated 2/13/99 6:52:01 AM Pacific Standard Time, dmc@MINN.NET
><< But looking at current trends in software and
> backwards compatibility I don't think that computers of the future will be
> infinitely backwards compatible. >>
>There are certain to be new fancy computers with proprietary archictures such
>as the MAC, but the business world is different. The business world will
>accept any computer now or in the future that will not run their current
>software. Therefore, Infinite backwards compatibility is absolutely
>the world of business computers.
>come on folks. Its pretty much Q.E.D. on this point.
If infinite backwards capability were absolutely necessary in the world
of business computers everyone would still be running CP/M. Infinite
backwards compatibility does not now exist and never will; if you believe
it does try running Windows 98 on a PC/AT or MacOS 8.5 on a Mac 512.
Businesses will buy the machine that best meets their needs at the
minimum cost; when another operating system comes along that's better
than a Wintel machine at a significant cost savings Windows will
disappear. Maybe not immediately, but in ten years it would be as dead
as CP/M, C64, Amiga, and Atari are today.