[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BKARTS] wiki wacked out

I took a look at the discussion on the page you referenced and I think
the article has a good chance of surviving the AfD (Article for
Deletion); several editors and you yourself have given some very good
reasons to retain it.  The MoMA holdings are certainly a big argument in
favor of keeping it.  You might also add any awards or other
recognitions you have received; that often helps establish notability. 
(On the other hand, as a frequent Wiki contributor with nearly 2000
edits I can tell you that mockery and sarcasm on the AfD discussion page
will definitely not help your case.)

Being proposed for deletion is not an insult, it is in essence a request
for more supporting information.  Wikipedia is quite naturally
suspicious of self-created articles as it's very difficult to write an
objective article about oneself.  Literally thousands of advertising and
vanity articles get created in WP daily; they do need to be weeded out;
and the process *does* work, I've seen it do so innumerable times.

Michele C.

> On Jan 30, 2007, at 12:00 AM, BOOK_ARTS-L automatic digest system 
> wrote:
> > It appears that I am to be deleted from Wikipedia because of lack of
> > notability. My books are "vanity books." Help.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ 
> > Jules_Siegel
> >
> > Those of you who disagree might consider sharing your thoughts about
> > this at the URL above.

         The Bonefolder, Vol. 3, No. 1, Fall 2006 Now Online at
Guild of Book Workers' 100th Anniversary Exhibition Online - Catalog Available
             For all your subscription questions, go to the
                      Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
          See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]