[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[BKARTS] Wiki credibility

Last year, I read a critical article in a well known magazine that 
argued the Wikipedia could not a true creditable reference such as an 

>>I also read an article last year on wikipedia,

It's comparing Wiki to the Encyclopedia Britannica, they compared error
rates with Wiki having an average of just under 4 errors per article and
EB having just under 3 which doesn't sound much worse to me. 


A far to extensive stay in University taught me that once you are out of
your second year undergraduate you should never use any general source
material anyway - ditch the encyclopedias, compendiums and survey texts!
In eight years, the last four of which wiki was available, every
professor I had lived by that rule, even having such material in my
bibliography was circled.  

I personally think Wikipedia is a great resource, but I am sorry they
are thinking of cutting you Jules and hope that they reconsider. 


         The Bonefolder, Vol. 3, No. 1, Fall 2006 Now Online at
Guild of Book Workers' 100th Anniversary Exhibition Online - Catalog Available
             For all your subscription questions, go to the
                      Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
          See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]