[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BKARTS] WOID XIX-26. The First. Book. Ever.

Fascinating. Thank you, Paul.
The Time Out video "Beyond Babylon" shows this "book" for a fraction of a second right at the end.


> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:25:20 -0700
> From: woid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [BKARTS] WOID XIX-26. The First. Book. Ever.
> To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> WOID XIX-26. The First. Book. Ever.
> Exhibition Review: Beyond Babylon: Art, Trade and Diplomacy in the
> Second Millennium B.C.” 
> Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
> Through March 15
> So nice when you pursue an idea (over years, sometimes), and it turns
> out others are pursuing similar ideas and then you meet up by accident.
> There’s a show like that at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in a way
> predictable, in the same way satisfying, because it ties together knots
> that have been waiting to be tied for a long, long time. Oh, and the
> works on display are of very high aesthetic quality, meaning they look
> real purty.
> About ten years ago I started teaching a course at the Metropolitan
> Museum of Art, “Art across Cultures,” and the happiest has always
> been the “across” part, not that which makes cultures and nations
> and ethnicities distinctive (which is the original anthropological
> ambition of most historical museums), but what connects them: exchanges,
> superficial similarities, universal patterns, perhaps, and our own ways
> of thinking about them. Over the past ten years I’ve noticed the
> Museum itself coming closer to a similar cross-cultural model. The
> Mezzanine area at the Met has harbored a collection of “Export Ware”
> porcelain for a while now; more recently, a few areas have been devoted
> to the Art of the Silk Routes. And a large number of temporary
> exhibitions have driven home the point – like this one. 
> “Beyond Babylon” clarifies a point which has been pretty obvious to
> anyone interested in Bronze-Age Art: that Bronze-Age people were far
> more developed (or maybe regressive) in terms of systematic techniques
> of production and commerce. Bronze-Age Art, like Obama-Age Art, didn’t
> come from the inner spirituality of its makers as much as it came from
> well-organized systems of production and exchange. 
> The lynchpin for this argument is the centerpiece of this show, the
> Uluburun Shipwreck, here on view in a slightly over-the-top design built
> to look like a ship’s prow. The original archeological team that
> discovered the wreck, the earliest-known ship in existence, were
> primarily interested in the enormous copper ingots that sank with it;
> they suspect the captain and crew were Canaanites from the present coast
> of Israel/Palestine/Lebanon, ferrying raw material (either copper or
> glass ingots), across the Mediterranean to be turned into weapons or
> artworks in local workshops.
> However, the cultural diversity of the objects found in the Uluburun
> Ship was far richer than expected: not only raw materials were exchanged
> in the fourteenth century BCE, but also decorative and functional
> objects, or objects so decorative as to move beyond the functional.
> It’s not at all clear how this trade in “artworks” operated, or
> even the trade in raw materials, since exchanges were by barter only
> (cold cash didn't appear for another five centuries or so); but it’s
> obvious from a number of other items in this show that certain objects
> were traded for qualities we’d have to call “aesthetic,” most
> noteworthy a series of highly polished and abstracted Egyptian
> figurines: they have some of the qualities of the Art Deco
> “streamline” look, perhaps for the same functional reasons.
> Likewise, the exhibit attempts to pinpoint the origin of narrative
> subject matter in Western Art: the idea of having images "tell a story"
> seems to have originated with the Minoans, and spread from there.
> II)
> The star of this show, however, is the writing board, or rather writing
> boards found in the shipwreck. By some kind of poetic logic they were
> preserved in a shipment of pomegranates – the pomegranate is the
> symbol of Life in Death in Greek Mythology. These are by far the oldest
> such objects known, and the earliest example of what would eventually
> become a bound book.
> It’s long been known that the type of book used in Europe is derived
> from the sets of wooden boards attached together that were used for
> quick notetaking and sketches down through the Middle Ages: each board
> was covered with wax, and the writer could scratch out a message with a
> fine point or stylus, perhaps erasing if she had to with the other end
> of the stylus. The boards would then be closed, and the writing
> protected. 
> What’s unique about the Uluburun Boards is the hinge: it’s made of
> ivory, which is probably the main reason the boards survived
> more-or-less intact. A number of similar hinges and boards have been
> found in other excavations, but never the two together, and the function
> of the hinges was only guessed at previously. The hinge system is
> particularly elegant, though: the hinge – hell, the binding - is
> composed of three ivory dowels, hollow, and rotating around a wooden
> dowel at the center. There are holes on either side of the
> top-and-bottom ivory dowels, which attach them to the boards on either
> side by smaller dowels, so that the book’s wooden leaves can rotate
> around the larger top-and-bottom dowels. The larger dowels raise the
> book a little when it’s open, so the two leaves can lie fully open on
> a flat surface – assuming, of course, there were flat surfaces circa
> 1360 BCE.
> III)
> In The Red and the Black Stendhal tells a story in passing, about the
> deeply spiritual priest who for years had longed to play with a little
> puppet that happened to be on the mantelpiece of his spiritual director
> – till one day he finally got up the courage to play with it, and that
> was that. This show has received some curious reviews, implying it's too
> "difficult" for the average viewer. That would be true if, like your
> average New York Times critic, the average viewer has never enjoyed
> working with his hands, or taking a clock apart. It would be nice if our
> spiritual aesthetes some day could come down to the level of a hand-held
> booklet just simply to imagine the cool, concrete and practical joy of
> the thing one puts together and takes apart again. Go see “Beyond
> Babylon”: you’ll have the galleries pretty much to yourself.
> - Paul Werner
> http://woid.theorangepress.com
> WOID: a journal of visual language
>              ***********************************************
>   Please note that attachments to listserv messages are not permitted,
>             and are automatically removed by the listserver.
> For all your subscription questions, go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
>          See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information.
>              ***********************************************

Love Hotmail?  Check out the new services from Windows Live! 
  Please note that attachments to listserv messages are not permitted,
            and are automatically removed by the listserver.
For all your subscription questions, go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
         See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information.

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]


Search BookArts Archives

This page last changed: May 19, 2009