[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PraGnant --- comments

I can come up with 3 reasons.

Weight (for the itinerant apt binder)

I love the Kensol, and using yours was a dream. Working with the force on my side was great and I use one with my Kwikprint Model 86, a machine I have also come to love mostly because it's solid and allows me to do what I need to do.

That said, I was way faster with the Prägnant on pretty much any titling job, especially in production work we did 100+ runs of all different titles and worked off of templates.

Both the Kensol and Prägnant have their advantages and limitations. The Kwikprint is in the muddle but a good comprimise...

While I can see a small advantage to the PraGant (although I have not
used one), I would wonder why spend the money on a machine that is so
limited. The same comments apply to the KwikPrint.

Let me open another can of worms and say that I use foundry type from M&H, not brass. At the time (1999) I got 8 sizes of 2 faces for around $2000 total. More letters of small sizes, less of the big... Used them for production work on rough cloth, into paper, vellum, and leather. Never really lost any letters except to students. A great compromise, for those that don't want the expense of brass.



Peter D. Verheyen
Bookbinder & Conservator, PA - AIC
The Book Arts Web & Book_Arts-L Listserv
The Bonefolder: an e-journal for the bookbinder and book artist

Please note that attachments to listserv messages are not permitted,
and are automatically removed by the listserver.
For all your subscription questions, go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information.

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]


Search BookArts Archives

This page last changed: May 19, 2009